Prediction of Mattias Southcombe vs Gilad Tamar Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Southcombe vs G. Tamar

Mattias Southcombe
GBR
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
25
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Gilad Tamar
ISR
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
25
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Southcombe 1 - 0 Tamar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mattias Southcombe winning 2 and Gilad Tamar winning 0. The last match between Mattias Southcombe and Gilad Tamar was at the M15 Akko, 18-05-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mattias Southcombe getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Southcombe | 1 |
| Tamar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Akko(05-18-22)
Mattias Southcombe
6
6
Gilad Tamar
1
4
M. Southcombe vs G. Tamar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.86% (107-112) | Career Total W/L | 47.69% (62-68) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Southcombe vs G. Tamar Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mattias Southcombe has won 36.36% of points on their second serve, while Gilad Tamar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mattias Southcombe, in recent form, has won 52.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gilad Tamar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.14% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mattias Southcombe has saved 65.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gilad Tamar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mattias Southcombe has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 18/16), with Gilad Tamar winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mattias Southcombe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 87/83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Gilad Tamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 59/63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/5).
- Player level: In the last year, Mattias Southcombe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 18/16), where as Gilad Tamar has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mattias Southcombe winning 1 times and Gilad Tamar being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mattias Southcombe winning 2 and Gilad Tamar winning 0.
- The last match between Mattias Southcombe and Gilad Tamar was at the M15 Akko, 18-05-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mattias Southcombe getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mattias Southcombe has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.18 while Gilad Tamar has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mattias Southcombe has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gilad Tamar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mattias Southcombe has converted 75.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gilad Tamar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Mattias Southcombe vs Gilad Tamar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Southcombe vs G. Tamar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:15:0 | Average Match Time | 1:15:0 |
| 45% (20/44) | 1st Serve % | 50% (28/56) |
| 80% (16/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (18/28) |
| 46% (11/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 18% (5/28) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 59% (33/56) | Return Points Win % | 39% (17/44) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Southcombe 35%, Tamar 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Southcombe 50%, Tamar 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Southcombe 59%, Tamar 0%.
M. Southcombe Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 3-6 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 5-7 10-5 | ||
G. Tamar Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||

M. Southcombe vs G. Tamar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.86% (107/112) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.69% (62/68) |
| 49.40% (246/252) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.04% (128/150) |
| 49.61% (2504/2543) | Games Win/Loss | 48.05% (1184/1280) |
| 51.18% (87/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.36% (59/63) |
| 48.15% (13/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 33.33% (7/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 600 | Aces Total | 57 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 937 | Total Double Faults | 121 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 197.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 165.38 |
| 58% (4652/8072) | 1st Serve % | 51% (912/1801) |
| 70% (3243/4652) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (587/912) |
| 40% (1351/3420) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (364/889) |
| 38% (295/769) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (57/123) |
| 39% (3092/7931) | Return Points Win % | 36% (572/1576) |
| 48.86% (107/112) | Futures W/L | 47.69% (62/68) |
| 49% (107/218) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (58/125) |
| 52% (26/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (10/26) |
| 48% (29/61) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (15/23) |
| 84% (118/99) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (63/57) |
| 16% (118/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (63/6) |
| 8% (101/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (67/5) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction10:00 PM 15/11/25
Prediction05:10 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Liam Broady vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
16:25
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
17:45
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico